Tool Optimization MapComplimentaryYour stack looks solid on paper.Let's prove it.
Tell us what's in your security stack. We'll map every product's claimed capabilities against the framework of your choice, and show you where you're covered, where you're doubling up, and where you're exposed.
No integrations.No cost.Just clarity.
10 minutes to submitReport back in 24 hours
Your stack, self-reported
10 products submitted
0%
0
0
0
Every vendor describes the same thing differently.
Your stack has likely accumulated over years, by different people, from vendors who each invented their own vocabulary. Nothing is wrong with any single product. The problem only appears when you try to see them as one system. Before any of it can be compared, someone has to build the shared language. Product by product, claim by claim.
Overlap you're paying for twice
Different products, same capability, same line item next renewal.
Gaps nobody's found yet
A framework requirement with nothing in your stack actually claiming to meet it.
A stack built by accumulation, not design
Tools added over years, never reviewed as a whole.
Three steps. Ten minutes. One clear picture.
Tell us your stack
List the security products you believe you have in place. No integrations, no access required.
You pick the framework
Choose one of the 17 frameworks we already maintain, spanning compliance standards, adversary models and defensive frameworks.
We map the capabilities
We translate each product's documented capabilities into a shared taxonomy, built from vendor documentation, not guesswork. Then we lay that map over your framework.
See the Tribal Layer in action
After your reportAfter we deliver your Tool Optimization Map, we'll demo how the Tribal Layer adds real operational context to the documented view of your stack.
One report. Three answers.
Coverage
What your stack genuinely addresses, based on documented capability.
Overlap
Where two or more tools claim the same ground.
Gaps
Where your framework calls for something nothing in your stack claims to cover.
10 products · mapped to NIST CSF 2.0
Documented capability only. Illustrative sample.
Coverage
72%
Overlaps
4
Gaps
4
What your stack genuinely addresses, by framework function, based on documented capability.
Map your stack.
Two ways in, depending on how you'd rather work. Either way it's Complimentary, and either way you get the same map.
This is what your stack says. Not what it does.
This report is built entirely from documented capability, what each product claims on paper. It won't tell you whether those tools are configured properly, adopted by your teams, or actually doing what the vendor promised.
That's a different question. Usually the more important one and one we can answer separately.
Once we've delivered your report, we'll demo the Tribal Layer and show how it adds the human and operational context that documentation alone cannot provide. There's nothing extra to complete when you request the map.
Want to apply the Tribal Layer across the whole stack, with the evidence behind it?
Ask us about the Security Reality BaselineThe questions everyone asks first.
No. This is self-reported. Just tell us what you have.
About 10 minutes to submit. Report back in 24 hours.
Yes. No trial, no card, no catch.
18 in total, including NIST CSF, ISO 27001, CIS Controls, the NCSC CAF, the enterprise, ICS and mobile ATT&CK matrices, and MITRE D3FEND. Our own products taxonomy is always mapped alongside whichever one you pick. The full list is in the form above.
It's yours to keep and share. We'll also demo the Tribal Layer, which shows how operational context can turn the documented view into a clearer picture of how your stack actually performs. For a complete assessment across the stack, that's where the Security Reality Baseline comes in.